ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 Standards

Similar to the organized approach to problem solving contained in ISO 9000

and ISO 14000, an organized approach is necessary to achieve certification. Although the written requirements contained in ISO 14001 are straightforward and brief, the level of effort required to conform with the requirements should not be underestimated.

If an environmental review of the facility‘s operations has not been conducted, it is important to retain a qualified consultant to conduct the review. which should focus on the requirements of ISO 14000 versus programs currently in use. This activity is known as a Gap Analysis.?E After the Gap Analysis is completed, the environmental status of the operation should be known and the level of effort necessary to develop the ISO 14000 program understood.

It can easily take six months to a year to develop a program that meets EMS requirements. Staff should develop the EMS program as they will ultimately be required to manage it. If staff is inadequate to develop the program, a consultant can be retained to provide guidance to staff as the program is being developed.

But, retaining a consultant will not resolve the problem of long term program maintenance. The ultimate goal of developing the EMS is to obtain certification/registration. Aside from the internal benefits offered by the ISO 14000 series of standards, external benefits may be derived through the certification/registration process. The certification/registration process only applies to ISO 14001, and this is the only standard to which the audit process applies. For the purposes of certification/registration, all other ISO 14000 standards are considered guidance. Certification can either be by a self declaration?Eor by an independent registrar.

Obviously the use of an independent registrar would give more credibility to those looking at an organization from outside.

Registrars have individual preferences about how the requirements should be administered. A registrar should be selected early in the process to help ensure that the program being developed is consistent with the registrars preferences. When the program is fully prepared and implemented, the registrar will be notified and a formal program audit undertaken. This audit will not result in a denial of ISO 14000 certification, but it may result in either approval or a list of deficiencies that must be corrected before certification.

Reduce the time and cost of implementing the new specification by acquiring a concise, yet thorough understanding the scope of ISO 14001:2004 and key terms.

Avoid spinning your wheels by learning precisely which modifications and additions to ISO 14001:2004 require your attention for compliance with ISO 9001:2008.

Get a quick handle, through hands-on activities, on the environmental aspects of ISO 14001:2004, including how to:
- Develop an environmental policy statement appropriate for your company
- Integrate processes for identifying environmental aspects and impacts
- Identify environmental objectives, set related targets, and establish programs for achieving results
- Integrate environmental responsibilities and authorities into a management system
- Outline an environmental awareness and training program
- Establish environmental metrics and indicators for monitoring performance
- Integrate requirements on non-conformance and corrective and preventive actions into your existing system
- Understand the purpose and scope of the environmental management review
- Integrate document control requirements of ISO 14001:2004 into your current system
- Identify those operations that need to be controlled under EMS and identify emergency operations and contingencies that must be considered as part of EMS

Get off to a running start by learning to use a versatile prioritization matrix to identify and prioritize significant environmental aspects and impacts.

Optimize understanding and retention with the Plexus Learning Model
- Multiple learning channels through lecture, coaching, group activities, innovative learning exercises and case studies.
- Hands-on insights. Lecturing is minimized so learning is maximized.
- Learn by doing. Connect the lessons learned to your real world by using your current circumstances as examples for activities.

This clause has been separated from 4.5.1 and includes two sub-clauses, as well as clarification and an addition to the ISO 14001:1996 standard. Included in Clause 4.5.1 of ISO 14001:1996 was a requirement for the organisation to periodically evaluate compliance with relevant (now applicable) environmental legislation and regulations. This requirement has been retained in Clause 4.5.2.1 of the revised standard. In Clause 4.5.2.2, ISO 14001:2004 includes evaluation of compliance with other requirements to which the organisation subscribes, which was not specifically required by ISO 14001:1996. This clarification also includes a requirement for records of periodic evaluations of compliance to be kept.

The UK-based Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA) has published an opinion that this means that compliance against each and every piece of legislation / regulation relating to an organisation’s environmental aspects will need to be evaluated before it can be considered to be in conformity with ISO 14001: 2004; it will not be acceptable for organisations to claim that the periodic evaluation will be covered by their internal EMS audit program at some future date.

This has always been one of the most difficult issues in ISO 14001:2004, and organisations will need to review and revise their compliance procedures to ensure that they meet these new requirements.

Read more on ISO 14001 Standards at http://www.e-wia.com

Role of Governments in ISO 14001 Standards

Although ISO 14001 is a set of voluntary standards that individual companies may or may not choose to adopt, governments can clearly have a role in providing information, establishing the necessary framework and infrastructure, and, in some cases, helping companies to develop the
basic capabilities to adopt ISO 14001. There are wo particular areas in which government action would be useful:
(a) providing information on he sectors and markets where ISO 14001 certification s a significant issue and assisting sector rganizations to develop appropriate responses, and
(b) helping to establish a certification framework, ased on strengthening national standards organizations and encouraging competitive private sector provision of auditing and certification
services. At present, the World Bank is having discussions with a number of countries about how assistance could be provided with these issues.

Governments should see EMS approaches as part of a broad environmental strategy that includes regulatory systems, appropriate financial incentives, and encouragement of improved industrial performance. Such encouragement can really only be effective where there is cooperation at the government level between the relevant departments, including industry and trade, as well as environment. There is a growing interest in integrating environmental management issues into productivity or competitiveness centers designed to promote SME performance, but little information exists on experience to date.

There has been a clear shift in the profile of users of EMS since the 1990s.  Typically, the early adopters of the ISO 14001 Standard were in the heavy industry and manufacturing sectors – companies that had large-scale environmental impacts and experience of using ISO 14001 Standards in management.There has been a clear shift in the profile of users of EMS since the 1990s.  Typically, the early adopters of the ISO 14001 Standard were in the heavy industry and manufacturing sectors – companies that had large-scale environmental impacts and experience of using ISO 14001 Standards in management.

However, as environmental issues have increased in importance, organizations in the service and support sectors have adopted EMS as well. The spectrum of EMS users has broadened to areas including zoos, farming, schools and universities, military services, media, ships and airlines.

ISO 14001 certification now reaches cruise ship companies, marine transportation services, container carriers and leading ship classification societies.

Almost all airlines and airports can be expected to be certified within the next ten years. Recreation, holidays, browsing in shopping malls. More and more small- and medium-sized enterprises are discovering the benefits of certification. The myth that ISO 14001 is difficult to implement for small business is de-bunked by the fact that more than 200 German chimney sweeps are certified.

The number of EMS users will continue to grow, particularly as ISO 14001 penetrates more effectively into supply chains.

The real challenge in the future, however, will be how well the ISO 14001 participants deal with the most compelling environmental threats – climate change, resource use, biodiversity loss and legal compliance.

For ISO 14001 to maintain its international currency as a force for environmental protection, it will need to demonstrate that it is able to support action on these areas and remain an effective tool for sustainable consumption and production.

ISO14001: A Deterrent against Environmental Degradation

ISO 14001 is being pushed as an agenda, therefore, which will help in lowering environmental impacts that occur because of the manufacturing sector. On the surface, the picture is quite rosy.

For large manufacturers adopting ISO 14001 is quite practical and makes economic sense. The major assumption while formulating the ISO 14001 was that there is no informal manufacturing sector (because of poor representation and inactive role of the developing countries at TC207). Informal sector in Pakistan is a major component of the manufacturing sector and provides useful support to the formal sector. The informal sector exists within the populated areas, making it extremely hard to regulate. Therefore, the environmental impacts due to this sector are quite significant.

ISO 14001 requires the suppliers of a manufacturer to have an Environmental Management System (EMS) in place as well. For a supplier operating from a small facility in a congested area and meager resources, how can s/he be expected to hire a consultant to develop an EMS? In a country which has a significant informal manufacturing sector, high unemployment due to deteriorating economic condition, high inflation, limited resources, weak monitoring agencies and deteriorating infra-structure, with all these constraints, how is it possible for the manufacturing sector to adopt ISO 14001 in it’s true spirit?

Even if a manufacturer adopts the ISO 14001, what is the guarantee that s/he will get business? What is the incentive for the non-exporting manufacturers to adopt ISO 14001? How can the industry be convinced that ISO 14001 is an opportunity not an obstacle? Considering all these factors, this paper will analyze the current status of ISO 14001 adoption in Pakistan, reasons for adoption, deterrents in adoption, and recommendations on how those deterrents can either be removed or minimized, and it’s overall impact on the environment and economy.

International standardization began in the electrotechnical field when the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) was established in 1906. The International Federation of the National Standardizing Associations (ISA) was then set up in 1926 to create standards in the field of mechanical engineering.International standardization began in the electrotechnical field when the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) was established in 1906. The International Federation of the National Standardizing Associations (ISA) was then set up in 1926 to create standards in the field of mechanical engineering.

Four years after ISA was dissolved in 1942, delegates from 25 countries decided to create a new international organization, ISO, “to facilitate the international coordination and unification of industrial standards.”  Since its creation, ISO has experienced three major turning points. For its first 40 years, ISO followed its initial mission, focusing on technical standards for specific products or technologies such as screws, sizing systems for clothing and shoes, and laser technology.  The organization’s first turning point came in the 1980s when ISO delved into the development of “process” standards, specifically the ISO 9000 Quality Management System standards. The creation of generic management standards that could cover almost any industry sector was a notable departure from the product/industry/technology-specific nature of previous ISO standards. The ISO 9000 series became ISO’s most widely known and successful (measured by sales) standards ever, with more than half a million organizations adopting them globally.

ISO’s evolution continued with another turning point a decade later. In 1993, with the creation of ISO/TC 207 to develop the ISO 14000 Environmental Management standards, ISO took its most notable step into the public policy arena, extending its influence beyond industry and their customers, and into issues of general public interest.

Six decades after its creation, ISO has grown into the world’s largest and most widely recognized standards development organization. ISO’s influence is exercised not solely through its size and popularity, but also because of the status of its outputs as the world’s “trade-legal” standards as recognized by the World Trade Organization (WTO).  Once nationalized, these international standards can become market requirements (even for companies without foreign operations), for instance, as part of government procurement criteria, as has happened in the case of the ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 series standards.

There is, therefore, little doubt that any new ISO standards in the social or environmental field can and will have a sizable influence on businesses, governments, and civil society around the world.

Currently, a total of 148 countries participate in the ISO confederation, either as a member body (97 countries, with active participation and voting rights), as a correspondent member (36 countries, without voting rights but full information access), or as a subscriber member (15 countries, with reduced membership fee and limited access to the information).

ISO 14001 Standards Audit
ISO 14001 sets out a system that can be audited and certified. In many cases, it is the issue of certification that is critical or controversial and is at the heart of the discussion about the trade implications.Certification means that a qualified body (an accredited certifier) has inspected the EMS system that has been put in place and has made a formal declaration that the system is consistent with the requirements of ISO 14001.The standard allows for self-certification, a declaration by an enterprise that it conforms to ISO 14001. There is considerable skepticism as to whether this approach would be widely accepted, especially when certification has legal or commercial consequences. At the same time, obtaining certification can entail significant costs, and there are issues relating to the international acceptanceof national certification that may make it particularly difficult for companies in some countries to achieve credible certification at a reasonable cost. For firms concerned about having certification that carries real credibility, the costs of bringing in international auditors are typically quite high, partly because the number of internationally recognized firms of certifiers is limited at present.2The issue of accreditation of certifiers is becoming increasingly important as the demand increases.Countries that have adopted ISO 14001 as a national standard can accredit qualified companies as certifiers, and this will satisfy national legal or contractual requirements. However, the fundamental purpose of ISO is to achieve consistency internationally. If certificates from certain countries or agencies are not fully accepted or are regarded as second class, the goal will not have been achieved. It is probable that the international marketplace will eventually put areal commercial value on high-quality certificates, but this level of sophistication and discrimination has not yet been achieved. It is essential to the ultimate success of the whole system that there be a mechanism to ensure that certification in any one country has credibility and acceptability elsewhere.The ISO has outlined procedures for accreditation and certification (Guides 61 and 62), and a formal body, QSAR, has been established to operationalize the process. At the same time, a number of established national accreditation bodiesheavily involved in ISO have set up the informal International Accreditation Forum (IAF) to examine mechanisms for achieving international reciprocity through multilateral agreements (MLAs). However, these systems are in the earlystages, and many enterprises continue to use the established international certifiers, even at additional cost, because of lack of confidence in the acceptability of local certifiers.Given the variability in the design of individual EMS and the substantial costs of the ISO 14000 certification process, there is a growing tendency for large companies that are implementing EMS approaches to pause before taking thislast step. After implementing an EMS and confirming that the enterprise is broadly in conformance with ISO 14001, it is becoming routine to carry out a gap analysis to determine exactly what further actions would be required to achievecertification and to examine the benefits and costs of bringing in third-party certifiers.
ISO 14001 Standards Certification

ISO 14001 Standards sets out a system that can be audited and certified. In many cases, it is the issue of certification that is critical or controversial and is at the heart of the discussion about the trade implications.

Certification means that a qualified body (an accredited certifier) has inspected the EMS system that has been put in place and has made a formal declaration that the system is consistent with the requirements of ISO 14001 Standards.

The standard allows for self-certification, a declaration by an enterprise that it conforms to ISO 14001 Standards. There is considerable skepticism as to whether this approach would be widely accepted, especially when certification has legal or commercial consequences. At the same time, obtaining certification can entail significant costs, and there are issues relating to the international acceptance of national certification that may make it particularly difficult for companies in some countries to achieve credible certification at a reasonable cost. For firms concerned about having certification that carries real credibility, the costs of bringing in international auditors are typically quite high, partly because the number of internationally recognized firms of certifiers is limited at present.

The issue of accreditation of certifiers is becoming increasingly important as the demand increases.

Role of Governments in ISO 14001 Standards

Although ISO 14001 is a set of voluntary standards that individual companies may or may not choose to adopt, governments can clearly have a role in providing information, establishing the necessary framework and infrastructure, and, in some cases, helping companies to develop the
basic capabilities to adopt ISO 14001. There are wo particular areas in which government action would be useful:
(a) providing information on he sectors and markets where ISO 14001 certification s a significant issue and assisting sector rganizations to develop appropriate responses, and
(b) helping to establish a certification framework, ased on strengthening national standards organizations and encouraging competitive private sector provision of auditing and certification
services. At present, the World Bank is having discussions with a number of countries about how assistance could be provided with these issues.

Governments should see EMS approaches as part of a broad environmental strategy that includes regulatory systems, appropriate financial incentives, and encouragement of improved industrial performance. Such encouragement can really only be effective where there is cooperation at the government level between the relevant departments, including industry and trade, as well as environment. There is a growing interest in integrating environmental management issues into productivity or competitiveness centers designed to promote SME performance, but little information exists on experience to date.

The implementation of an ISO 9001 conformant system must recognize that it is but a step in a long-term development of a continually improving QMS. Unfortunately, it is often the case that ISO 9001 is taken as a means to an end, where the implementation of a QMS is not the primary objective, rather certification is. As a result, SMEs may end up with stacks of documentation waiting to be processed that adds no value, but cost.

According to the requirements of ISO 9001, an organization must develop only six documented procedures: (1) control of documents, (2) control of quality records, (3) internal audits, (4) control of non-conformities, (5) corrective action, and (6) preventative action. A quality manual and several records are also required. The development of other procedures, work instructions, and other documents is largely at the discretion of the organization. From the very beginning of the process, it is therefore essential that SMEs establish a balanced view between a short-term focus (marketing/sales) and a long-term focus (achieving company-wide quality awareness through TQM). ISO documentation should be considered as an enabler along that way and SMEs must guard against the creation of unnecessary documentation.

However, even when such a view is adopted, many SMEs struggle to move from their initial state to a fully functional ISO 9001 QMS. Over the last several years, we have been involved in ISO 9001 implementation projects in seven different SMEs. The SMEs have ranged in size from approximately 20 employees to 500 employees. The SMEs have been drawn from a variety of sectors in Virginia, including manufacturing, distribution, and services. Based on our experience, we developed a schematic of initial states of an organization in terms of the

existence and functionality the documentation required by the standard while functionality is equated with an effectively operated QMS that leads to increased customer satisfaction and continuous improvement of business results. A successful QMS must be fully functional and appropriately documented. With that in mind, there are four main states in which SMEs can be located in the beginning of the implementation process:

1. Complete Death: No documentation, no functioning This is the state in which there is no indication of the existence and functionality of the QMS. No documentation exists and no processes are in place to help ensure the quality of the product. Relatively few companies will find themselves in this situation.

2. Informally Alive: No documentation, some level of functioning Many SMEs exhibit an organic structure characterized by an absence of standardization and the prevalence of loose and informal working relationships. SMEs operating in this state are more likely to rely on people rather than a system. In such situations, key personnel may resist documentation for two key reasons “(1) documentation is considered a waste of time and (2) documentation of processes and procedures makes the individual less dependable” . SMEs in this state perform some or all of the processes required by ISO 9001 and the QMS may function fairly well. However, they are not willing and ready to document those processes unless there is a cultural change lead by top management.

3. Formally Death: Some level of documentation, no functioning SMEs categorized in this state have documented processes and procedures at some degree, however, the documents are generally not followed and do not necessarily reflect the actual manner in which the organization undertakes its operations and management. This situation highlights the fact that the mere existence of documentation does not necessarily lead to a functional QMS. Moreover, such a situation may help perpetuate the view that ISO 9001 is a way for SMEs to market their products and services but that implementation of the standard requires stacks of documents that offer no value.

4. Formally Alive: Some level of documentation, some level of functioning Each SME considered in this state, achieves a unique combination of the existence and functionality of processes and procedures that may or may not be required by ISO 9001. As illustrated in Figure 2, this situation is closest to the desired state of full functionality (100%) of the ISO 9001 QMS and full documentation (100%) of this functionality.